Change of approach. Current: Economic statistics for Statistics PRODUCTIVITY

[Jorge_Barrientos]

Good statistics always have a philosophy that supports them. In our case of FA, philosophy is to promote the current competition. It is not demonstrate which historical accumulations are worth more. To keep the head today, we must fight today.

In a column should show the historical accumulation of points the team, for historical reference . It wouldn't agree to zero again every year. But each team to maintain or exceed its position, must now provide their work. It stimulates ancient groups, because they easily go up or down, depending on your effort today. The new teams are on equal footing with the old ones.

I ask that they consider a different approach. CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY. It is not to defend the family inheritance. It's show, day to day who is the best. That more works.

To overcome productivity, not descend to move forward. It is a much more demanding approach to computers. But the goal is achieved, more production for FA. This would help not only in front, also in the media and smaller. Always have a rival, a passage to attack him. And at the same time defend is behind. Each level

Rankin PRODUCTIVITY  of:  COSTA RICA -Pura Vida- Folding
http://kakaostats.com/?col=8&offset=380 

I intend to base the Ránkin on that page in the current Coumna 8. 
Taking a month of reference not a week . This is to avoid normal cyclical and random moves in short periods of time, as a week.


A complete version of my proposal is in:
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19209&start=0 

Thank you very much!  Jorge Arturo Barrientos

[Kakao]

There is an intra team monthly/quarterly rank in  KakaoStats:

http://kakaostats.com/mrt.php?t=208154

There could a similar ranking for the teams.

[Jorge_Barrientos]

Thank you very much for your attention.   

I refer to the mobile month.  Better call him 30 days. On similarity of 7 days.     

A RANKIN based on a period of last "30 days". Removes the natural cycles within the month. Also removed weight to random variations. It provides a good basis to measure the current productivity.

On the other hand, the points in last 24 hours; has all the possible defects; from the point of view of data analysis. Power cuts. Large packages. Long or short game. Week-end. Etc, etc, etc.   
-----
The defense of large accumulated capital; It is fierce.   What Folding@home, needed today for the research, is capacity computer today.  Not for three years; This is for historical analysis. Therefore the RANKIN's current participation must be on a current basis. NOT HISTORICAL.     

This does not contradict that "Important" historical accumulation of team stands in a column. But this accumulation; IT SHOULD NOT BE THE BASIS FOR QUALIFYING THE CURRENT RANKIN; from a rational, not interested in donations point of view.

We apologize for the Dyslexic English. Microsoft!!!  Use short sentences; in order to mitigate the problem.  We continue talking, the subject is of great importance.